GM & AGM

Its only dumb because it apply to you and some others would have been doing this for year.

A)I have never seen a manager have a good record and be trash at the game even at the AHL/NHL record. There is a direct correclation between the quality fo your Mangers and the quality of your team. Same goes for your record and the quality of player you are.

B) legacy you mean the guys who have 50+ win teams ever year and blow people out of the water? do you really think thats fun and fair for everyone else?

C) the time period that those numbers apply mean they are relevant to recent seasons, so if you had 15 wins in s4 that doesn't matter because they only look back 2 seasons

 

It filters out some people right away which would make it easy for bogs to vet the remaing candidates. I still think Bogs should have a say in AHL managers and have veto powers but thats up to them

 

I will say A) is dogshit. There are great owners that aren't great players but build great teams every season. There are also good players that build dogshit teams every season.

Snipester says silly things, don't respond with silly things because then he can make good points.

 

But have you seen a great owner win 15 games in the NHL drop down to the AHL because of lack of skill. I'm hard pressed to think of an owner in recent history that has done that and has dropped to the AHL the next year because he will bad.

 

I think this post got way too serious and if you think we should be in the N then we will

 

And cap?

 

Was making a joke about your grammar.

 

You a real one

 

*you’re

and no I’m not

 

Honestly lazy just because you’re not getting your way doesn’t mean that others shouldn’t get the opportunity to manage in the ahl. If the league allows them to manage then their is nothing you can to do about. You complaining constantly in 13 diffrent forums isn’t going to change the bogs/heads minds about you at D lmao.

Also I agree that (some) guidelines should be set to whom may manage in lower leagues but who doesn’t love a little bit more competition

 

K bud @cap

 

Another weirdo that makes an assumption that I'd ever want to play D in the AHL






I would never sign up for AHL D. I also never intended to GM for more than this season. Got any more silly assumptions?

 

I’m talking about winning 15 in the ahl not nhl. I’m saying an owner in the ahl who wins 15 games but has the best team in the ahl and plays on his own third line. That guy shouldn’t be forced to move up because his caliber of play is only AHL level but since he has the best team it’s a rule. That would ruin the league tbh and make the AHL/CHL even worse than it already is.

 

I was only refering to NHL wins for guys trying to move down. AHL and CHL manager would have a different set of critera that would force them to move up

 

Nobody is forced to move up... there are still late sign ups

It would just prevent people from taking AHL GM to be $0 when they should be in the NHL. If you want to play AHL, you have to go for your market value in the AHL.


Dodging bidding & dodging the NHL shouldn't be allowed. You do 1 or the other.

 

You won't win the argument on players signing up late to dodge the NHL @Lazy Pedestrian . McDonald does it every season because he also doesn't want to play in the NHL. It's common for a lot of players to do it. But certain players should be denied mgmt in AHL for sure. But they should have a legit criteria that the bogs follow to deny or allow management in. Last season RyO was denied as a Dman and he hadn't had a relevant season in the NHL in over 5 seasons. But he was denied because he's (played in the NHL for too long they said ) which I felt at the time is bogus. They need a real criteria with stats and such to deny or allow players to take AHL management . Would prevent a lot of confusion on why some managers get in and some dont.

 

He literally said if you are too good for the ahl you shouldn’t get approval for a free contract and if you want to play ahl you should get that price tag that’s deserved

 

Yes and I'm saying they need to have an actual criteria with stats and numbers to determine who is too good for AHL management and who isn't. Every season some people are denied and some aren't and everyone is scratching their head why or why not certain players get in. Yet there is no actual numbers to say why a certain played was denied. Just the bogs "decision" on who's good and who's not.

 

I've seen NHL players get denied management because they had good stats on NHL 18 and it's now nhl20.... Just saying. There needs to be a set guideline for why players are denied or not. Not just because they've been in the NHL since S1 so that's where they belong..... I'm sorry but not everyone adapts to every NHL game the same way as they did on NHL 16 or 17

 

Wow, has anyone see. A Nhl owner be allowed to manage the next season in ahl? I haven’t. That’s what my comment was about. Had nothing to do with skill level. I agree both should be Nhl, but if they want to play ahl go for it. I don’t think they should open that door to allow that. Both guys are great guys and can build good teams