Team Power Rankings Total Power Ranking 1 - Providence Bruins - (4.44) 2 - Cleveland Monsters - (4.39) 3 - Charlotte Checkers - (4.32) 4 - San Diego Gulls - (4.28) 5 - Utica Comets - (4.25) 6 - Tucson Roadrunners - (4.22) 7 - Springfield Thunderbirds - (4.17) 8 - Hershey Bears - (4.14) 9 - Binghamton Devils - (4.14) 10 - San Jose Barracuda - (4.13) 11 - Stockton Heat - (4.08) 12 - Manitoba Moose - (4.08) 13 - Syracuse Crunch - (4.07) 14 - Chicago Wolves - (4.07) 15 - Rochester Americans - (4.05) 16 - Bridgeport Sound Tigers - (4.05) 17 - Ontario Reign - (4.02) 18 - Milwaukee Admirals - (4.01) 19 - San Antonio Rampage - (4.00) 20 - Belleville Senators - (3.93) 21 - Toronto Marlies - (3.92) 22 - Rockford IceHogs - (3.92) 23 - Iowa Wild - (3.89) 24 - Texas Stars - (3.84) 25 - Wilkes Barre Scranton Penguins - (3.83) 26 - Colorado Eagles - (3.83) 27 - Lehigh Valley Phantoms - (3.82) 28 - Hartford Wolf Pack - (3.78) 29 - Laval Rocket - (3.78) 30 - Bakersfield Condors - (3.71) 31 - Grand Rapids Griffins - (3.62) Forwards 1 - Manitoba Moose - (4.53) 2 - Providence Bruins - (4.52) 3 - Tucson Roadrunners - (4.48) 4 - San Diego Gulls - (4.45) 5 - Hershey Bears - (4.38) 6 - Cleveland Monsters - (4.36) 7 - Utica Comets - (4.33) 8 - Binghamton Devils - (4.29) 9 - Bridgeport Sound Tigers - (4.28) 10 - San Jose Barracuda - (4.25) 11 - Stockton Heat - (4.25) 12 - Toronto Marlies - (4.25) 13 - Syracuse Crunch - (4.20) 14 - Colorado Eagles - (4.17) 15 - Rochester Americans - (4.16) 16 - Chicago Wolves - (4.15) 17 - Ontario Reign - (4.15) 18 - Texas Stars - (4.12) 19 - Springfield Thunderbirds - (4.12) 20 - Belleville Senators - (4.10) 21 - Iowa Wild - (4.08) 22 - Laval Rocket - (4.06) 23 - San Antonio Rampage - (4.05) 24 - Rockford IceHogs - (4.04) 25 - Wilkes Barre Scranton Penguins - (3.94) 26 - Lehigh Valley Phantoms - (3.88) 27 - Milwaukee Admirals - (3.87) 28 - Hartford Wolf Pack - (3.84) 29 - Bakersfield Condors - (3.79) 30 - Grand Rapids Griffins - (3.71) 31 - Charlotte Checkers - (3.24) Defenders 1 - Cleveland Monsters - (4.28) 2 - Springfield Thunderbirds - (4.14) 3 - San Diego Gulls - (4.09) 4 - Providence Bruins - (4.06) 5 - Lehigh Valley Phantoms - (4.02) 6 - Chicago Wolves - (4.00) 7 - San Jose Barracuda - (3.98) 8 - Milwaukee Admirals - (3.97) 9 - Binghamton Devils - (3.95) 10 - Ontario Reign - (3.92) 11 - San Antonio Rampage - (3.91) 12 - Belleville Senators - (3.89) 13 - Utica Comets - (3.88) 14 - Stockton Heat - (3.86) 15 - Charlotte Checkers - (3.84) 16 - Syracuse Crunch - (3.82) 17 - Bridgeport Sound Tigers - (3.79) 18 - Tucson Roadrunners - (3.79) 19 - Hartford Wolf Pack - (3.78) 20 - Rochester Americans - (3.68) 21 - Hershey Bears - (3.67) 22 - Rockford IceHogs - (3.65) 23 - Bakersfield Condors - (3.63) 24 - Manitoba Moose - (3.62) 25 - Laval Rocket - (3.59) 26 - Wilkes Barre Scranton Penguins - (3.52) 27 - Iowa Wild - (3.49) 28 - Grand Rapids Griffins - (3.42) 29 - Texas Stars - (3.38) 30 - Colorado Eagles - (3.26) 31 - Toronto Marlies - (3.25) Goalies 1 - Charlotte Checkers - (5.67) 2 - Milwaukee Admirals - (4.73) 3 - Providence Bruins - (4.67) 4 - San Jose Barracuda - (4.61) 5 - Cleveland Monsters - (4.55) 6 - San Antonio Rampage - (4.52) 7 - Hershey Bears - (4.50) 8 - Rochester Americans - (4.47) 9 - Springfield Thunderbirds - (4.39) 10 - Manitoba Moose - (4.37) 11 - Stockton Heat - (4.34) 12 - Binghamton Devils - (4.32) 13 - San Diego Gulls - (4.25) 14 - Utica Comets - (4.14) 15 - Wilkes Barre Scranton Penguins - (4.12) 16 - Rockford IceHogs - (4.11) 17 - Colorado Eagles - (4.05) 18 - Texas Stars - (4.01) 19 - Chicago Wolves - (4.01) 20 - Tucson Roadrunners - (4.00) 21 - Laval Rocket - (3.96) 22 - Syracuse Crunch - (3.96) 23 - Ontario Reign - (3.91) 24 - Bridgeport Sound Tigers - (3.91) 25 - Grand Rapids Griffins - (3.90) 26 - Toronto Marlies - (3.88) 27 - Lehigh Valley Phantoms - (3.75) 28 - Iowa Wild - (3.74) 29 - Hartford Wolf Pack - (3.51) 30 - Bakersfield Condors - (3.49) 31 - Belleville Senators - (3.36) Explaning the results: This data looks at the players on all teams, and every single (non-preason) game they've ever played in this league, averages out their performance and returns a power ranking formula in which we break up by position group and then total.
1. His rankings were done before trades were made 2. these are based off of all games played at all levels. 3. My team had the number 1 defense in s27 and we got pooped on all season. These rankings mean nothing.
never said they mean anything just nice to see a power ranking based off stats instead of popularity. Of course they mean nothing it doesnt have chemistry what teams will fall apart or bad and good trades through the season. All I was saying is its nice to see a ranking based off something other then whose blowing who in the chat. I think its fair to say I didnt call out any team or say we are better then anyone just stated a fact.
Uh, ya you will be? These rankings said my team was first overall in goalies, the season I switched to goalie having never played it before. The stats are skewed and random.
I feel these rankings place too much weight on goalie stats. As long as your goalies are passingly competent, they're going to be equally beat by EA and good plays. The elite 10% may swing games for a team. Granted that @Filthy Ws looks like a guy who could steal games. The MAA (Macros Adjusted Average) for Charlotte is 3.69. Unfortunately two other teams in their division also have high end goaltending, so Charlotte is kinda fucked unless their forwards exceed expectations or they work some trade magic. Let's see if they can start off the season with FF's for roster violations. Good luck this season @jyeti15s, sincerely!
Tris factors in club game performance by position for players who have no previous LG games playing G. True story.