Parity in LG: AGM or No AGM? (Prediction)

Discussion in 'Leaguegaming Hockey League (LGHL)' started by Optehic, Feb 7, 2018.

?

Is no AGM better for LG?

  1. Yes - Creates parity and forces talent to take management

  2. No - Bring AGM back

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Optehic

    Optehic Rated R #22 LD/RD

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2017
    Messages:
    157
    Trophy Points:
    1,353
    Location:
    New York
    Ratings:
    +269 / 8 / -11
    After experiencing bidding and seeing the talent spread throughout the league, some talent/eh talent on crazy contracts, do you agree no AGM will help create more parity in the league this season? The future upside is more talent takes management next season and eliminates awful owners. I think this season is unique as many top-end players tested the waters of bidding and will realize that they must take owner next season to be successful. The end goal is better owners, right?

    Discuss.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    No Streaming Account
  2. Rehanek

    Rehanek EASHL Historian

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2014
    Messages:
    449
    Trophy Points:
    1,943
    Ratings:
    +1,681 / 229 / -261
    FREE MEEK MILL
     
    • Like Like x 7
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • Creative Creative x 1
    Offline
    RehanekYT
  3. Scheckel29

    Scheckel29 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2009
    Messages:
    591
    Discord:
    Scheckel29#4117
    Trophy Points:
    4,423
    Location:
    Connecticut
    Ratings:
    +782 / 6 / -7
    Can I vote after the season? Everyone has a shot at the cup right now but really only a few will be cup contenders.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    Offline
    Scheckel29
  4. Drew x 8

    Drew x 8 Mr. Fundamentals

    Joined:
    May 12, 2013
    Messages:
    351
    Trophy Points:
    1,703
    Location:
    Erie, PA
    Ratings:
    +436 / 76 / -128
    Definitely no AGM pre bidding. I don't even think pre bidding GM should be a thing but i can understand a GM tho. Pre bidding AGM just allows the best players to stack even more. Show me a solution that says every NHL team realistically has a chance pre bidding. Right now Edmonton is eliminated every season as soon as poopy is announced owner.
     
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2018
    • Like Like x 3
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Creative Creative x 1
  5. Lovonov_

    Lovonov_ I know more about the Red Wings than you do

    Joined:
    May 2, 2017
    Messages:
    38
    Discord:
    Saarijarvi#1475
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Detroit, Michigan
    Ratings:
    +42 / 3 / -3
    I think this format is best. Creates a level playing field moving in to bidding (for the most part).
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
    Offline
    Lovellyy
  6. Benny El Guapo

    Benny El Guapo Just bout that action

    Joined:
    May 7, 2014
    Messages:
    101
    Trophy Points:
    208
    Ratings:
    +108 / 42 / -13
    Free agm lets higher end players pick the team they play for at a reduced cost, it without a doubt hurts half the teams before bidding even starts. You nailed it hopefully the better players take owner which will help the league and make more competitive teams throughout
     
    • Like Like x 3
    No Streaming Account
  7. RJYorke

    RJYorke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2013
    Messages:
    105
    Trophy Points:
    893
    Ratings:
    +468 / 4 / -3
    Having an agm is necessary to help run the team. It should be assigned once bidding is complete, which leaves the option to trade them. This will prevent stacking teams before bidding, and add balance.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    No Streaming Account