POLL: Performance EQ ON or OFF

Discussion in 'LGNCAA PSN' started by Shush, Sep 2, 2004.

  1. Shush

    Shush Renegade Admin

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2003
    Messages:
    6,435
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    POLL: Performance EQ

    Same as the other Poll. Post your vote and any comments if you wish.

    I vote EQ off.

    I will go along with the majority of course.
     
    No Streaming Account
  2. Latdogg

    Latdogg Chicago Sports Fan

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    7,321
    Trophy Points:
    191
    Location:
    Northamptonshire, England
    Ratings:
    +17 / 0 / -0
    I vote to keep it off, PLEASE!
     
    Offline
    Gajeske85
  3. IndigoVDub

    IndigoVDub Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2003
    Messages:
    3,467
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Tempe, AZ
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Off.
     
    No Streaming Account
  4. bowdown

    bowdown Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2003
    Messages:
    880
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    off
     
    No Streaming Account
  5. Stang6697

    Stang6697 Dallas Stars Captain

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2003
    Messages:
    812
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Location:
    Arlington, Texas, United States
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    off
     
    No Streaming Account
  6. Jman

    Jman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    851
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Off please!
     
    No Streaming Account
  7. jmarks2001

    jmarks2001 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    221
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Location:
    Tallahassee, FL
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    uhhh...

    I Vote On.
     
    No Streaming Account
  8. macteago

    macteago Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2003
    Messages:
    131
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I'm going with off. The D may play smarter but now all receivers not just star receivers haul in ball like they have leather magnet gloves.

    I'm a poor team in the steelers 78 ovl, i don't mind the challenge...
     
    No Streaming Account
  9. Junk69

    Junk69 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2003
    Messages:
    932
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Location:
    Calgary
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -1
    I'd prefer it off.
     
    No Streaming Account
  10. lilheavy

    lilheavy Louisiana Swamp Cat

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    898
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Location:
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    off
     
    No Streaming Account
  11. canucks33

    canucks33 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,681
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    seattle, wa & langley, bc
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    whatever or maybe a flipflop :lol:
     
    No Streaming Account
  12. Giotto

    Giotto Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,209
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Maryland
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    looking like the minority i vote "on"
    Its all good
     
    No Streaming Account
  13. jmarks2001

    jmarks2001 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    221
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Location:
    Tallahassee, FL
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    This statement about the receivers completely contradicts what Shush said he didn't like about EQ, "too many dropped passes". These are two extremes, but my experience has been somewhere right in the middle and that's why I like it.

    I don't think everyone is giving it a fair shot, or even trying it at all. I think we're going to see some really outlandish statistics for the season with EQ off.
     
    No Streaming Account
  14. Giotto

    Giotto Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,209
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Maryland
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I agree, the games i played it was nice to have the DB play their zones. I know when I play ill see backs run in the wrong direction for no reason. I could time my pass block/int's. When I blew the call on D I got burned. There was less this feel of no matter what i call he is still going to move the ball at will. With the Giants and a 73 rated D and no LB or DB above 78 ratings i have to call it almost perfect to stop an important drive.
     
    No Streaming Account
  15. jmarks2001

    jmarks2001 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    221
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Location:
    Tallahassee, FL
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I normally play with the G-Men too Giotto. I know they have a crappy defense this year (in the game and in real life), but it's just magnified to such a degree where you feel like there's no way to make a stop when you really need one. With EQ on, it's still hard as their D still doesn't match up very well, but I feel like I'm more in control of the situation.

    My strategy is to play safe defenses that pretty much give up 1st downs just so I can prevent big plays and hopefully force a turnover by the time they reach my endzone.
     
    No Streaming Account
  16. Junk69

    Junk69 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2003
    Messages:
    932
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Location:
    Calgary
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -1
    For me, stats are not the issue. I've played all three seasons of ESPN. The last two seasons I played with a horrible Chargers squad. I now have a mid-range rated team and have paid my dues to get it. To 'even' things up would just put me right back where I started.

    Also, I'm not a great player to begin with and I can use any advantage I can get against the many great players in our league.
     
    No Streaming Account
  17. Giotto

    Giotto Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,209
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Maryland
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    That doesnt make much sense too me. I can understand wanting EQ on for a sim game like the real NFl. But if your argument is having a better team this season. Then what of guys like Indigo who have the Lions this year and has played every season and been the Commish for 2 seasons. And then is it fair based on your argument to have new owners get Philly?
     
    No Streaming Account
  18. Giotto

    Giotto Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,209
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Maryland
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I have had allot of games where i have one in every stat, time of possion rushing and passing, but have lost the game. The only thing i can put my finger on is my D. I do need to play better D, but i wouldnt mind a little help. The good thing is it had forced me to play a better game.
     
    No Streaming Account
  19. WilloMan

    WilloMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2003
    Messages:
    1,993
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    *EDIT* :oops:

    off
     
    No Streaming Account
  20. Shush

    Shush Renegade Admin

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2003
    Messages:
    6,435
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Vote only guys. Discuss in the other thread.
     
    No Streaming Account