Please VOTE! Proposed League Changes

Discussion in 'Leaguegaming Hockey League (LGHL PSN)' started by Pxnarin, Jun 14, 2021.

?

Proposed Changes

  1. Keep minimum bid to 500K

    52.6%
  2. Change minimum bid to 750K

    5.9%
  3. Roster wipe the league between game cycles

    27.4%
  4. Keep as is

    50.4%
  5. Remove multi season deals but increase resigns

    13.3%
  6. Keep as is

    51.1%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. TheSilIiestGoose

    TheSilIiestGoose Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2019
    Messages:
    276
    Trophy Points:
    1,061
    Location:
    New York
    Ratings:
    +755 / 8 / -30
    With there having been some recent discussions on major changes to the structure of the league, mostly surrounding how contracts are constructed, I wanted to see what the majority of the player base thinks. (Vote was originally done with managers on both consoles)
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Dumb Dumb x 1
    Offline
    pxnarin_
  2. Stav 98

    Stav 98 Greatest Never

    Joined:
    May 7, 2016
    Messages:
    896
    Trophy Points:
    3,301
    Location:
    Canada
    Ratings:
    +1,145 / 157 / -233
    This is not what has been proposed
     
    Offline
    Stavio_98
  3. premierplayer

    premierplayer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2015
    Messages:
    487
    Discord:
    premierplayer#8142
    Trophy Points:
    501
    Location:
    USA
    Ratings:
    +741 / 265 / -371
    Managers chat leaking? Anyways is there any explanation of the reason these should be changed or are we looking to randomly change stuff for the hell of it? Like what is the thought process behind moving from 500k to 750k? Why not make it 1 million?
     
    • Dumb Dumb x 5
    • Informative Informative x 1
    Offline
    premierplayer
  4. ViveLeQuebec_81

    ViveLeQuebec_81 Never forget where you come from

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2017
    Messages:
    102
    Trophy Points:
    1,241
    Location:
    Québec, Canada
    Ratings:
    +104 / 1 / -9
    the real change to do in LGHL is to give salary to OWNER and GM, that the best way to have more parity inside that league.
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
    Offline
    ViveLeQuebec_81
  5. Sharpxo

    Sharpxo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2017
    Messages:
    155
    Trophy Points:
    2,091
    Location:
    k
    Ratings:
    +137 / 3 / -15
    Just keep it how it is
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Winner Winner x 1
    No Streaming Account
  6. FrenchMoron

    FrenchMoron Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2017
    Messages:
    672
    Trophy Points:
    5,851
    Location:
    North
    Ratings:
    +1,977 / 67 / -186
    No. How do you decide their salary? There is no good way to judge what the worth of a manager is. Hence why the free contract. VG tries to do that and it's awful and always was. Stats don't show everything, team success doesn't show everything. This is not and will never be the right way.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    No Streaming Account
  7. Primetimme

    Primetimme - Nick.

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    1,061
    Trophy Points:
    7,001
    Ratings:
    +3,486 / 39 / -140
    I can’t believe in all my years on NHL I’m actually suggesting this,

    but if you want more parity, think about taking away the free GM. Make GM a spot you need to acquire in bidding, and make teams not just about acquiring as much talent as possible, but make bringing in people who want to be a part of a team and help run it, be a viable reason to bid on them.

    it also forces owners to take more responsibility, takes away the “I’m a free contract so if you suck it’s not on me” GMs, it makes building a good team that much more difficult in my opinion.









    In my defense, I don’t like the idea of what I just said, but I’m saying this because it’s a realistic idea I think to help LG PSN
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Like Like x 1
    Offline
    Primetimme1
  8. FrenchMoron

    FrenchMoron Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2017
    Messages:
    672
    Trophy Points:
    5,851
    Location:
    North
    Ratings:
    +1,977 / 67 / -186
    This only helps about 3 bad owners every season. But this hurts tremendously the 7-8 average ones that are actually on good terms with a good player.

    What we need to figure out is how to get more good owners. I don't think that solution helps out with that.
     
    No Streaming Account
  9. BroadwayCJ97

    BroadwayCJ97 Your GF's Favorite Commentator

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    489
    Trophy Points:
    1,041
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Ratings:
    +607 / 53 / -157
    Where's the vote for Broadway having uninterrupted PBP streams three games a night on the PSN forum
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    Offline
    BroadwayCJ97
  10. FrenchMoron

    FrenchMoron Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2017
    Messages:
    672
    Trophy Points:
    5,851
    Location:
    North
    Ratings:
    +1,977 / 67 / -186
    Your whole idea there @Primetimme seems to be to level the playing field, when really all it does is make it even harder for the middle of the pack to compete. It won't hurt the Top Player Owners. It only helps the bad ones cause they don't save a ton of money on that free contract anyways. But 90% of Owners do.

    Also think about a new owner having to go through bidding by himself. Having a 9-5 like most normal human beings with 0 help. That's 72 hours of absolute hell for that guy.

    I just don't see this being a good thing.

    As a guy that loves the management side but haven't been enjoying the game as much, I think the ability to have an extra free contract that's not allowed to play could be an idea to look into.

    Probably will never happen, but I'm sure there's other who love to manage but know they lack the thumb skills to be worth it that would look into it.

    I'm not asking for that to happen. Just think it could be an option.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    No Streaming Account