S10 Bidding Fudge Up

Discussion in 'Leaguegaming Hockey League (LGHL PSN)' started by Lazy Pedestrian, Feb 6, 2019.

  1. I_Smash_Fatties

    I_Smash_Fatties Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2013
    Messages:
    1,142
    Trophy Points:
    6,551
    Ratings:
    +4,619 / 55 / -82
    [​IMG]
     
    • Winner Winner x 4
    • Like Like x 1
    Offline
    sirbat10
  2. Man-Bear-Pig

    Man-Bear-Pig LGHL PSN Deputy Commissioner & BOG

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2015
    Messages:
    572
    Discord:
    Man-Bear-Pig#5324
    Trophy Points:
    691
    Location:
    King of Prussia, PA
    Ratings:
    +408 / 3 / -16
    The tool we use to remove a player (without a ban) is the same tool that can also apply a ban. We are aware that when a player is banned in Xbox they are also banned and removed from PSN, and vice versa.

    Learning this off-season that removing a player (without a ban) also processes a removal in the Xbox league too. PSN Staff doesn't have controls to make Xbox corrections and it's been overlooked. I'm re-training myself to check for Xbox S32 sign ups and communicating with my Xbox counterparts.
     
    Offline
    KingOfAllHumans
  3. Lazy Pedestrian

    Lazy Pedestrian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    771
    Discord:
    Lazy Pedestrian#0421
    Trophy Points:
    3,941
    Location:
    Nova Scotia
    Ratings:
    +2,218 / 53 / -169
    That's a positive

    But there is still a question or two here - Why did the owners essentially get punished for bidding on players that were in bidding? And why was the logic used in this ruling different than the logic used in the season 8 ruling? [the logic I'm referencing is "Well if he's in bidding and is willing to play while being retired, he can play."]


    This is yet another example of a ticky-tacky fuck up that was out of the control of owners but at the end of the day the owners are punished. It's these type of events that result in owners not returning and owners not returning is how you end up with idjits like Dudester on the owner list :oops:
     
    Offline
    LazyPedestrian
  4. Man-Bear-Pig

    Man-Bear-Pig LGHL PSN Deputy Commissioner & BOG

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2015
    Messages:
    572
    Discord:
    Man-Bear-Pig#5324
    Trophy Points:
    691
    Location:
    King of Prussia, PA
    Ratings:
    +408 / 3 / -16
    "Well if he's in bidding and is willing to play while being retired, he can play." - This was not the original decision. In S8 we originally removed the player from bidding and from Florida's roster. However this decision came later at night, and when there was only a day left in bidding the call was reversed.

    No owner or team was punished in S10. Any player removed from bidding was also removed from the finance tables so positions and salary caps were corrected. We enforced the rules and removed the ineligible players from bidding. Players and teams were notified quickly so effected teams could resume bidding.
     
    Offline
    KingOfAllHumans
  5. Faytal_Flow

    Faytal_Flow Season 6 Calder/Vezina/Jennings/Lindsay Runner-Up

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2017
    Messages:
    180
    Discord:
    Shucky#9999
    Trophy Points:
    3,341
    Location:
    Canada
    Ratings:
    +627 / 22 / -54
    lol.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    Offline
    ShuckyDucky322
  6. OdessaSteps

    OdessaSteps Touch my Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2015
    Messages:
    698
    Discord:
    BJ#8606
    Trophy Points:
    1,191
    Location:
    Montreal
    Ratings:
    +2,282 / 11 / -79
    This isn't entirely true, unfortunately. Next to available cap, the greatest commodity in bidding is time. The clock ran out on players during the time teams were committed to the players that were removed. The players aren't technically punished, but the owners definitely were. This was the wrong call.
     
    • Winner Winner x 6
    Offline
    bjstreamsthings
  7. HurrichaneScoot

    HurrichaneScoot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2013
    Messages:
    285
    Discord:
    ScooTz91#5149
    Trophy Points:
    5,641
    Ratings:
    +917 / 66 / -156
    this literally sums up why staff dont get it, none of them except john have owned and understand what its like to be mgmt in this situation
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Like Like x 1
    Offline
    scootz10
  8. Ryan_x_28

    Ryan_x_28 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2016
    Messages:
    321
    Discord:
    ryan_x_28#6675
    Trophy Points:
    2,591
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    Ratings:
    +602 / 28 / -63
    Say to my face that I wasn't punished.
     
    Offline
    ryan_x_28
  9. HurrichaneScoot

    HurrichaneScoot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2013
    Messages:
    285
    Discord:
    ScooTz91#5149
    Trophy Points:
    5,641
    Ratings:
    +917 / 66 / -156

    u removed the player in s8 and then proceeded to allow him to play when there was 1 day of bidding left. but when its day 3 of s10 bidding and no one left on the board of any serious value u remove them from the teams that won them and tell them goodluck. how does that make sense.

    its literally the EXACT situation same day of bidding and everything
     
    Offline
    scootz10
  10. xSkjei

    xSkjei Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2015
    Messages:
    615
    Discord:
    Chief#9925
    Trophy Points:
    2,541
    Location:
    Coral Springs, FL
    Ratings:
    +1,983 / 221 / -341
    What is the harm in letting the players who were removed, play? After all, it was a site error. Not an error on the owners or the staff but something out of anyone's control. No harm, no foul.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    Offline
    Chieef27
  11. Lazy Pedestrian

    Lazy Pedestrian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    771
    Discord:
    Lazy Pedestrian#0421
    Trophy Points:
    3,941
    Location:
    Nova Scotia
    Ratings:
    +2,218 / 53 / -169
    It's actually scary if you think no owner was punished in this situation.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    Offline
    LazyPedestrian
  12. Seedoftavares

    Seedoftavares The Wayne Gretzky of sexual stuff

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2015
    Messages:
    163
    Discord:
    seedoftavares#9590
    Trophy Points:
    591
    Location:
    New york
    Ratings:
    +187 / 6 / -61
    Put them in ahl bidding if they want it, if not they have to wait until next season. It’s already too late to add them to nhl rosters
     
    Offline
    robshere
  13. x Tka c h uk 19

    x Tka c h uk 19 S10 LGHL PSN Calgary Flames Owner

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2015
    Messages:
    1,929
    Discord:
    Polska_B0SS_780#3227
    Trophy Points:
    911
    Location:
    Edmonton Alberta Canada
    Ratings:
    +2,391 / 148 / -417

    You do realize that teams who did not have players removed were affected by this as well. As it let other teams who lost players free up cap and up bid already teams with not alot of cap space lol. It also affected those teams that waited for these guys 10 hour timers to be up to get them on their team. Only to have them removed and lose out on other people that they could have got with that cap.
     
    Offline
    bossnationtv
  14. Nick_x_98

    Nick_x_98 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2016
    Messages:
    121
    Discord:
    Nick_x_98#4378
    Trophy Points:
    2,491
    Location:
    St.John's Newfoundland
    Ratings:
    +271 / 32 / -14
    Saying it didn’t effect teams is fucking ridiculous. You clearly don’t understand how bidding works if you don’t believe this hurt teams.

    A guy worth 5m in the first 36hours of bidding goes for 4-5m. A guy worth 5m after the 36 hour mark goes for 7+ because there’s less players available. You can say all you want that you handled it quickly but that doesn’t fucking matter. These teams had worked players into there plans already. These are the reasons people don’t stay as owner in this league.

    If the player was in bidding who gives a fuck when they signed up, everyone that checked bidding had the ability to see the player there, it’s not like the player was only visible for certain owners. Terrible judgement call to remove these players once already won.
     
    • Like Like x 4
    • Winner Winner x 2
    Offline
    nick_x_98
  15. NH4JP

    NH4JP Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2015
    Messages:
    864
    Trophy Points:
    1,291
    Location:
    Tabarnak Island
    Ratings:
    +2,111 / 55 / -153
    :facepalm:
     
    Offline
    NH4JP
  16. DamilkMan596

    DamilkMan596 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2017
    Messages:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    511
    Location:
    NY
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -2
    It seems that instead of wasting so much energy on fulfilling personal vendettas against other league members; time would be better spent by the BOGs actually running the league and understanding the impact of decisions they make. I feel bad for any owner effected by this, especially since the PSN BOGs can't even take responsibility and simply apologize.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    No Streaming Account