Who wants some?

Honestly i appreciate your post. It has brought some life to the forums and I'm sure that is what you were intending to do.
Concerning Ted... He was just stating that before you talk about other games you should play yours. In addition to that I think he mentioned something about being enrolled at Dartmouth, and from what i know you don't go to dartmouth if you can't read. So i don't think you need to worry about his reading comprehension level as much as you should be fearing his defense .

 

That was back when the game came out...sheesh are you still gloating over beating a rookie? Guess your afraid now? STATS PADDER!

 

Stats padder?

 

Hey indy. Yeah you can do something for me. Can you scratch my ass? I have an itch. Possibly hemmoroids? LOL !!! j/k. Thank God this place is getting lively.

 

Bingo...we have a winner!

Thanks Geraldo, but let Teddy speak for himself.

 

Yeah... Stats Padder!

 

Speaking of stats....76-63 sheesh! Check out the rushing yards in that game.

 

I'm not sure how accurate those stats are. According to the score by quarter NO won in overtime with a TD yet the final score is a 13 point win for the Saints. If that's wrong there might be something else. :? According to the stats between the 2 teams they only attempted 8 passes.

 

When have i ever padded stats? I'm soo sorry I actually throw the ball like real nfl qb's do and not run every down...soo sue me...

 

My first game I actually attempted 25 passes. Pretty realistic, only 8 passes between the two qbs :roll:

 

Yah thats pretty lame but if you play either of them you know what to expect!

 

The stats in the Saints vs Vikes dont make sense. Like Darthor said, there is a 13 point difference in the stats. Plus if you add the TD totals of each team, also doesnt make sense. Someone needs to call the Feds on this one. LOL !!

 

Anyone correct me if im wrong but I dont know how the Vikes scored 63 pts.

Moss scores 2tds, Bennett 5 even if they go for 2 on every td, thats only = to 56 pts. Lets say you add another 2 FGs its only 62. According to the stats it doesnt seem that the Vikes kicked any.

Saints:

McAllister 5tds, Horn 2, ferderson 2 if they go for 2's = 72 if only for 7pts = 63

Sooo there is obviously a mistake in the stats.

 

Kick returns, or defensive TD's, thats how they got the rest.

 

Good point Lattdogg.

 

The Saints points by quarter make no sense. The game didn't go to OT so why is there 6 in the OT? The game was won by 13 points. The Saints passed for 2 TD's. (14 points), ran for 7 TD's (49 points), had 1 INT (7 points, assuming it was returned for a TD) or instead of a INT TD he ran 2 KR back for scores (14 points) or a combination of the two. How was the last TD 6 points (FG's maybe)? It wasn't OT the way it adds up so maybe he missed an XP. Who knows? It just looks jacked up. The OT IS a mistake the way it shows now. No doubt about it.

 

Let's see.

It takes about 45 minutes to play a game. Instead of posting a thread on this board, you could have taken your oh so precious time and respond to one of the two emails I sent you, simply asking you if you could play on those days. Is it so hard to reply and say "No"? You posted replies to this thread from 3:44 - around 4:10, so that right there is a half hour that you could have used to play our game. Now, instead, we'll have to play it late.

And, I have used PM... then you said to email you, and I sent you two emails, and got no response. So I posted in this thread, because you seem to be paying lots of attention to it. Is that so illogical?

No, it's not. What IS illogical is your insult towards me. What the hell was the point of that? I just don't understand what compels you to say that. All I asked was for you to respond to my email, politely, which is more important than you posting this thread. You must lead a pretty sad and sorry life to insult people you don't even know, over the internet. Consider suicide.

But please play our game first.

 

Hey Ted. Don't forget that you glitch too. j/k