Please Vote! S36 Pavel Datsyuk Award Voting

Discussion in 'Leaguegaming American Hockey League (LGAHL)' started by skyre5, Sep 1, 2020.

?

Pavel Datsyuk Award Selection

Poll closed Sep 3, 2020.
  1. skyre5

    16 vote(s)
    30.2%
  2. RiCo505

    20 vote(s)
    37.7%
  3. Wayne Kenov

    7 vote(s)
    13.2%
  4. N1ghthors3

    6 vote(s)
    11.3%
  5. CalderCubs14

    4 vote(s)
    7.5%
  1. skyre5

    skyre5 AHL's Most Underpaid Player

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2014
    Messages:
    321
    Discord:
    313sky#2061
    Trophy Points:
    13,461
    Ratings:
    +559 / 34 / -71
    Vote will count towards a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place vote based on the final count from award committee.

    OEE (Own End Efficiency) - How much time in takes in TOA for other team to score a goal on you. The higher the time, the better.


    Pavel Datsyuk Award

    Awarded to the forward who best excels in the defensive aspects of the game

    Criteria:
    Considering the nature of our league, it will almost always be the case that players deserving of nomination for the Datsyuk will also produce at an above average level offensively. However, offensive production specifically should not be a factor in determining who is more deserving of the award. Also note that increasingly, although not exclusively, the Datsyuk is awarded to players in the AHL that play the position of center. Playing wing should hinder, but not preclude, a player from winning or being nominated for the Datsyuk.
    1) Stats to consider when evaluating players to nominate for the Datsyuk are the following: Record, +/-, PIM, FO%, GAA, and PPKE. Note that players should not receive a massive bonus due to a high +/- simply due to outlandish offensive production. GAA is a much more reliable indicator of defensive superiority than +/- is.
    2) Linemates.This is mainly to note that a player should not be significantly punished during consideration simply for playing with a talented line. However, players should not significantly benefit during consideration simply for playing on a below average team or with below average linemates.
    3) Strength of schedule. In a league where managers (and players, to a certain extent), are able to choose who they play against, it is important to consider strength of opposition when determining individual awards. The main things to examine here are record vs playoff teams as compared to record vs non-playoff teams, as well as GAA vs playoff teams as compared to vs non-playoff teams. Specifically, a player who plays a majority of his games against stronger teams and has a quality record in these games should be rewarded over players who mainly play against weaker teams.
    As far as GAA is concerned, it is expected that players will allow less goals against weaker teams. Players should only be downgraded in this area if they allow a significant and disproportionate amount of goals in games against playoff teams. In especially tight cases between players, also consider evaluating the individual lineups that players face throughout the season. Subjectively quantify teams' 1st/2nd/3rd lines, and examine how many of each the players have played against throughout the season, in combination with playoff/non playoff.


    :team352:@skyre5 21-6-1 27G 44A +48

    Playoff Teams Record: 10-6-1 28 Points
    Fringe Teams Record: 3-0-0 10 Points
    Non-Playoff Teams Record: 8-0-0 33 Points

    Defensive Stats:

    Faceoff Percentage: 52.8%
    Hits: 21
    Takeaways: 112
    Giveaways: 338
    OEE: 2:17
    Personal Penalty Kill %: 92.1%
    Goals Against / Game: 1.71



    :team352:@RiCo505 23-3-2 44G 54A +60

    Playoff Teams Record: 11-2-1 40 Points
    Fringe Teams Record: 2-1-0 11 Points
    Non-Playoff Teams Record: 10-0-1 47 Points

    Defensive Stats:

    Faceoff Percentage: 55.2%
    Hits: 141
    Takeaways: 106
    Giveaways: 294
    OEE: 3:06
    Personal Penalty Kill %: 69.0%
    Goals Against / Game: 2.21



    :team515:@Wayne Kenov 21-2-1 30G 46A +64

    Playoff Teams Record: 6-1-1 18 Points
    Fringe Teams Record: 3-0-0 3 Points
    Non-Playoff Teams Record: 12-1-0 55 Points

    Defensive Stats:

    Faceoff Percentage: 52.4%
    Hits: 67
    Takeaways: 68
    Giveaways: 225
    OEE: 2:52
    Personal Penalty Kill %: 73.7%
    Goals Against / Game: 1.96



    :team299:@N1ghthors3 20-6-1 21G 36A +26

    Playoff Teams Record: 6-3-0 16 Points
    Fringe Teams Record: 3-1-0 7 Points
    Non-Playoff Teams Record: 11-2-1 34 Points

    Defensive Stats:

    Faceoff Percentage: Winger
    Hits: 101
    Takeaways: 97
    Giveaways: 223
    OEE: 2:35
    Personal Penalty Kill %: 88.7%
    Goals Against / Game: 2.07



    :team299:@CalderCubs14 20-7-1 43G 27A +22

    Playoff Teams Record: 6-4-0 15 Points
    Fringe Teams Record: 3-1-0 10 Points
    Non-Playoff Teams Record: 11-2-1 45 Points

    Defensive Stats:

    Faceoff Percentage: 54.0%
    Hits: 129
    Takeaways: 86
    Giveaways: 359
    OEE: 2:30
    Personal Penalty Kill %: 87.5%
    Goals Against / Game: 2.18
     
    • Like Like x 3
    In Training
    No Streaming Account
  2. Clutch l28l

    Clutch l28l Washed Vet

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2015
    Messages:
    730
    Discord:
    Clutch#1521
    Trophy Points:
    6,916
    Location:
    Harrisburg Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +1,479 / 118 / -116
    @RiCo505 is my choice. Hell of a season.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    Offline
    the717clutch
  3. skyre5

    skyre5 AHL's Most Underpaid Player

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2014
    Messages:
    321
    Discord:
    313sky#2061
    Trophy Points:
    13,461
    Ratings:
    +559 / 34 / -71
    Fringe teams are Rochester, Cleveland, San Jose, and Ontario.
     
    In Training
    No Streaming Account
  4. TITO JAKS0N

    TITO JAKS0N BETTER CENTRE THAN YOU AND EVERYONE ELSE

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2018
    Messages:
    296
    Trophy Points:
    3,641
    Location:
    Canada
    Ratings:
    +283 / 48 / -68
    UR TELLING ME PRETTY MUCH ONLY 2 TEAMS HAD GOOD DEFENSIVE CENTERS? RIP
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    No Streaming Account